Alize Lim vs Enola Chiesa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Sep at 11:35 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Lim vs E. Chiesa

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lim 1 - 0 Chiesa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alize Lim winning 2 and Enola Chiesa winning 0. The last match between Alize Lim and Enola Chiesa was at the W50 Saint-Palais-sur-Mer, 03-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Alize Lim getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lim | 1 |
| Chiesa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Saint-Palais-sur-Mer(09-03-25)
A. Lim vs E. Chiesa H2H Profile
A. Lim vs E. Chiesa Match Preview:
- How do Lim and Chiesa compare in recent second serve performance? Lim edges out Chiesa slightly, winning 34.95% of points compared to Chiesa's 33.95% over the last six months.
- Who excels at returning their opponent's second serve? Lim leads with a 57.29% success rate, whereas Chiesa stands at 53.16%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, how do the players compare? Both are neck and neck, with Lim at 38.54% and Chiesa at 38.56%.
- Under pressure, who performs better in saving breakpoints? Lim has demonstrated a stronger ability, saving 49.09% of breakpoints compared to Chiesa's 42.46%.
- Overall performance in recent matches shows Lim has a better win rate at 61.9%, whereas Chiesa is at 55.32%.
- On which surface does Lim perform best? Lim excels on Clay with a 55% win rate, while struggling on Grass with no wins.
- What surface favors Chiesa? Chiesa performs best on Hard courts with a 58% win rate, and finds Indoor Hard the most challenging with only a 14% win rate.
- Analyzing player level, Lim wins 58.33% of matches in Challenger/ITF > $10K events, just ahead of Chiesa's 53.33%.
- Have they faced similar competition? Lim has played against tougher average competition ranked at 278.29, compared to Chiesa's 346.66.
- Who is more successful in deciding sets? Chiesa shines with a 60% win rate in deciding sets, while Lim has a 42% success rate.
- Lim shows greater breakpoint conversion efficiency at 47.12%, compared to Chiesa's 41.57%.
Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):
In their upcoming match, Lim demonstrates a slight edge across several key areas, including second serve performance and return game strength. These statistics are crucial predictors for match success.
While Chiesa exhibits strong performance in deciding sets, Lim's higher win rate and ability to play against tougher opponents indicate a better overall recent form.
Considering both players’ performance and the surface, Lim’s advantages in breakpoint conversion and pressure situations could provide a decisive edge in this matchup.
Taking all factors into account, Lim is more likely to emerge as the victor in this forthcoming contest.
Alize Lim vs Enola Chiesa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Lim vs E. Chiesa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1:51:18 | Average Match Time | 1:51:18 |
| 74% (51/69) | 1st Serve % | 61% (35/57) |
| 59% (30/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (17/35) |
| 61% (11/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 53% (30/57) | Return Points Win % | 41% (28/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Lim Recent Matches Played
E. Chiesa Recent Matches Played

A. Lim vs E. Chiesa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.05% (339/300) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.27% (173/158) |
| 53.01% (774/686) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.01% (396/351) |
| 52.19% (6860/6284) | Games Win/Loss | 50.78% (3506/3398) |
| 52.82% (103/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.50% (20/12) |
| 55.35% (207/167) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.78% (152/136) |
| 43.28% (29/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 9.09% (1/10) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 271 | Aces Total | 153 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 861 | Total Double Faults | 583 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:9 |
| 580.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 398.81 |
| 67% (13409/19920) | 1st Serve % | 70% (11047/15809) |
| 57% (7707/13409) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (6031/11047) |
| 43% (2768/6510) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (2001/4762) |
| 48% (1323/2731) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1048/2118) |
| 48% (9548/19953) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7418/15401) |
| 29.17% (7/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39.71% (27/41) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.34% (233/188) | Challenger W/L | 44.44% (52/65) |
| 57.60% (72/53) | Futures W/L | 56.54% (121/93) |
| 54% (335/623) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (170/328) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (57/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (30/50) |
| 49% (95/192) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (35/89) |
| 83% (347/289) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (177/151) |
| 16% (347/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (177/26) |
| 17% (292/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (153/20) |